The Impact of Covid-19 on Surgical Training and Outcomes: A Multicenter Experience (Greece and Romania)

Background. The COVID-19 pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges to health systems worldwide-in delivering care to patients and in maintaining training of their care providers. Surgical specialties have particularly struggled to maintain sufficient levels of training as we have seen significant reductions in the number of surgical beds, operating lists and redeployment of surgical staff to COVID-19 departments or Intensive Treatment Units. Methods. Comparison of the number of surgical operations performed between January 1st 2019 and December 31st 2020 in 3 surgical departments in Romania (Craiova, Timisoara and Bucharest) and 1 surgical department in Thessaloniki, Greece. Cases were compared on a month to month basis, both elective and emergency operations were included and divided into three main categories based on severity (Minor, Medium, Major). Results. Between 2019 and 2020, there was a 37.04% decrease in the number of surgical procedures, 36.95% for open procedures and 37.20% for laparoscopic procedures. Statistically significant overall reduction was observed in all three centers for both open and laparoscopic operations. In all centers, a statistically significant reduction in medium severity procedures was also observed. Conclusion. Globally felt detrimental effect on surgical training, patient contact and mental well-being reflected similarly across surgical specialties in both countries.

Emergency and Trauma Surgery.

According to the UEMS (Union Europeene des Medicins Specialises) Section of surgery Board of Surgery, "Emergency Surgery" can be defined "as surgery that is required to deal with an acute threat to life, organ, limb or tissue caused by external trauma, acute disease process, acute exacerbation of a chronic disease process, or complication of a surgical or other interventional procedure". Performance of emergency surgery require complex and varied skills and abilities to achieve procedures from different fields of surgery: abdominal, urologic, thoracic, vascular, soft tissue, skeletal) within an interval of 24 hours (1). In U.S., since 2008, Acute Care Surgery concept was introduced, and nowadays is an evolving specialty with three essential components- trauma, critical care and emergency surgery (2). In UK there is an increasing subspecialisation within general surgery over the last ten years. More recently, there has been an increase in focus on emergency general surgery (3,4). This may not come as a surprise given the fact that trafic crashes kill 1.2 million people annually around the world (3242 people/day) and 90% are in middle and low income countries. In US trauma is the leading cause of death in persons up to 40 years. Optimal care for emergency surgical patients is one of the major challenges for every healthcare system worldwide. An emergency surgery mai intervene during the daily schedule of elective interventions and create pressure on both the organisation and costs (5). Since it's birth, in 2007, the Romanian Society for Emergency Surgery and Trauma was involved in supporting the development of practice in emergency surgery in Romania by many actions: each year, during biannual National Congres and National Conference of the Romanian Society of Surgery 2 sessions were dedicated to emergency surgery, with invited foreign speakers; oragnisation of European Congres of Emergency and Trauma Surgery in 2017 in Bucharest, 1 tematic issue of Chirurgia Journal dedicated to surgery of the cirrhotic patients. This tematic isssue includes varia subjects from emergency surgery in valuable articles. The management of open abdomen management are depicted by Anastasiu et al, in a review summarizing definition, classification, indications, methods of temporary abdominal closure and fascial closure, and enterocutanous fistula. Turculet et al, perfomed a review of the litterature to describe the main advantages and disadvantages of the trauma systems in Europe and to present the last concepts regarding the management of the polytrauma patients and the newest sets of measures to prevent car crashes in European Union. A rare case of small bowel hemangioma with hemoperitoneum mimicking trauma is described by Iordache et al, with a review of the litterature. The series of reviews ends with an interesting article for daily practice in emergency hospitals about the diagnostic and therapeutic peculiarities in abdominal trauma associated with spinal cord injurie by Grigorean et al. Abdominal trauma is addressed in 7 original papers. The definitive surgery for liver trauma in tertiary HPB center, the nonoperative treatment of abdominal trauma involving liver and spleen, the timing of splenic interventional radiology, the management of colon trauma at a level II trauma, challenges raised by the retroperitoneal hematoma in abdominal trauma, predicition of evolution of patients with abdominal trauma using the usual biological parameters, and clinico-pathological correlations in the acute surgical abdomen in the pre and post COVID-19 pandemic period are presented, analysed and discussed in papers coming from specialized surgical units from Fundeni Clinical Institute, Emergency Clinical Hospital Bucharest, Emergency University Hospital of Bucharest, "Bagdasar-Arseni" Clinical Emergency Hospital, "St. Pantelimon" Clinical Emergency Hospital, Clinical County Emergency Hospitals of Craiova and Tg-Mures. The surgical technique of intraomental splenic implant and an attempt of reassessement is presented in a paper by Beuran et al. We hope that this tematic issue will be an interesting and very useful lecture for our readers and bring useful informations for those involved in emergency surgery.

Colorectal Surgery in Romania during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

As the COVID-19 pandemic extends, its negative consequences on the effectiveness of therapeutic programs - previously assumed by the medical community and imperatively suspended for a difficult-to-predict period of time - are becoming increasingly worrying. In this context, as the evidence-based recommendations are not possible, most of the national and international scientific societies tried to develop balanced recommendations (1-4). The Romanian Society of Coloproctology (SRCP) and the Romanian Association for Endoscopic Surgery (ARCE) have created a working group that, taking into account recent publications, the statements of international academic societies, the national legislative context and the unique experience of countries severely affected by this pandemic (China, Italy, Spain, USA, etc.) proposes for Romania, the following recommendations for medical practice in colorectal surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. These recommendations are subjected to continuous review, depending on the global and national situation of the pandemic, the particular needs of each hospital, the recommendations of the competent authorities and the evolution of the literature that publishes the conclusions of ongoing clinical trials.

SRED-ARCE Recommendations for Minimally Invasive Interventions During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Romania.

The Romanian Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SRED) and the Romanian Association of Endoscopic Surgery (ARCE) have decided to establish a joint working group to elaborate specific recommendations for organizing the diagnostic and the minimally invasive interventional procedures, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The recommendations are based on the guidelines of the international societies of endoscopy and gastroenterology (ESGE / BSG / ASGE / ACG / AGA), respectively endoscopic surgery (EAES SAGES) (4-8), on the experience of countries severely affected by the pandemic (Italy, France, Spain, USA, Germany, etc.) and they will be applied within the limits of measures imposed at local and governmental level by the competent authorities. On the other hand, these recommendations should have a dynamic evolution, depending on the upward or downward trend of the COVID-19 pandemic at regional and local level, but also according to the findings of professional and academic societies, requiring regular reviews based on the publica tion of further recommendations or international clinical trials. The objectives of the SRED and ARCE recommendations target the endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery activities, to support their non discriminatory used for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes, pursuing the demonstrated benefits of these procedures, in safe conditions for patients and medical staff.